Space test of the Equivalence Principle: first results of the MICROSCOPE mission
Pierre Touboul, Gilles M\'etris, Manuel Rodrigues, Yves Andr\'e,, Quentin Baghi, Joel Berg\'e, Damien Boulanger, Stefanie Bremer, Ratana Chhun,, Bruno Christophe, Valerio Cipolla, Thibault Damour, Pascale Danto, Hansjoerg, Dittus, Pierre Fayet, Bernard Foulon

TL;DR
The MICROSCOPE mission tested the Weak Equivalence Principle in space with unprecedented precision, finding no violation and setting new limits on possible deviations from Einstein's theory of gravity.
Contribution
First space-based test of the WEP achieving a sensitivity of 10^{-15}, improving ground tests by two orders of magnitude.
Findings
No detected violation of WEP within measurement uncertainties.
Set a new upper limit on WEP violation at approximately 1.3×10^{-14}.
Demonstrated the feasibility of high-precision space experiments for fundamental physics.
Abstract
The Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP), stating that two bodies of different compositions and/or mass fall at the same rate in a gravitational field (universality of free fall), is at the very foundation of General Relativity. The MICROSCOPE mission aims to test its validity to a precision of , two orders of magnitude better than current on-ground tests, by using two masses of different compositions (titanium and platinum alloys) on a quasi-circular trajectory around the Earth. This is realised by measuring the accelerations inferred from the forces required to maintain the two masses exactly in the same orbit. Any significant difference between the measured accelerations, occurring at a defined frequency, would correspond to the detection of a violation of the WEP, or to the discovery of a tiny new type of force added to gravity. MICROSCOPE's first results show no hint for such…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
