Excited States via Coupled Cluster Theory without Equation-of-Motion Methods: Seeking Higher Roots with Application to Doubly Excited States and Double Core Hole States
Joonho Lee, David W. Small, Martin Head-Gordon

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel approach using coupled-cluster ground state formalism with a maximum overlap method to accurately target doubly excited and double core hole states without relying on equation-of-motion methods.
Contribution
The authors demonstrate that $ riangle$CCSD and $ riangle$CCSD(T) methods outperform traditional EOM-CCSD for doubly excited states, providing nearly exact results with improved numerical stability.
Findings
$ riangle$CCSD(T) achieves near-exact accuracy for doubly excited states.
CVS-$ riangle$CCSD(T) accurately calculates double ionization potentials.
The approach offers a promising alternative to EOM methods for certain excited states.
Abstract
In this work, we revisited the idea of using the coupled-cluster ground state formalism to target excited states. Our main focus was targeting doubly excited states and double core hole states. Typical equation-of-motion (EOM) approaches for obtaining these states struggle without higher-order excitations than doubles. We showed that by using a non-aufbau determinant optimized via the maximum overlap method the CC ground state solver can target higher energy states. Furthermore, just with singles and doubles (i.e., CCSD), we demonstrated that the accuracy of CCSD and CCSD(T) far surpasses that of EOM-CCSD for doubly excited states. The accuracy of CCSD(T) is nearly exact for doubly excited states considered in this work. For double core hole states, we used an improved ansatz for greater numerical stability by freezing core hole orbitals. The improved methods,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
