Beyond the one-dimensional configuration coordinate model of photoluminescence

TL;DR

This paper introduces the optimized configuration path (OCP) method and the double energy parabola hypothesis (DEPH) as advanced models for analyzing photoluminescence, improving upon the traditional one-dimensional configuration coordinate model.

Contribution

The paper proposes two new models, OCP and DEPH, that better predict energy barriers and geometries in photoluminescent materials compared to the traditional 1D-CCM.

Findings

OCP and DEPH yield lower ground-state energies than 1D-CCM.

OCP reveals multiple local minima, complicating geometry determination.

Both models improve understanding of non-radiative transition barriers.

Abstract

The one-dimensional configuration coordinate model (1D-CCM) is widely used for the analysis of photoluminescence in molecules and doped solids, and relies on a linear combination of the equilibrium nuclear configurations of ground and excited states. It delivers an estimation of the energy barrier at which ground and excited state curves cross, semi-classically linked to non-radiative transition rate and thermal quenching. To assess its predictive power for the latter properties, we propose a new \textit{optimized configuration path (OCP) method in which} the ground-state and excited-state forces are mixed instead of their configurations. We also define another one-parameter model thanks a double energy parabola hypothesis (DEPH). We compare the OCP method and the DEPH reference with the 1D-CCM for three paradigmatic 4f-5d phosphors Y$_3$Al$_5$O$_{12}$:Ce, Lu$_2$SiO$_5$:Ce, and YAlO$_3$:Ce. We find that the OCP and DEPH methods yield similar results with geometries that have significantly lower ground-state energies than the 1D-CCM for the same 4f-5d energy difference. However, the OCP method suffers from the appearance of multiple local minima, rendering the clear determination of the optimal geometry very difficult in practice. Still the OCP method allows one to quantify the deviations from the 1D-CCM, therefore increasing confidence in the lower bound obtained from the DEPH for the 4f-5d crossing barrier, and its comparison with the energy of the auto-ionization thermal quenching mechanism. We expect the OCP approach to be applicable to other luminescent materials or molecules.