Role of Defects in Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Monodoped vs Codoped SrTiO$_3$
Manish Kumar, Pooja Basera, Shikha Saini, and Saswata Bhattacharya

TL;DR
This study investigates how doping SrTiO$_3$ with different elements affects its ability to split water using light, finding that codoping with Mn and N significantly improves photocatalytic performance under visible light.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that codoping SrTiO$_3$ with Mn and N effectively enhances its photocatalytic activity by suppressing charge recombination and improving charge mobility.
Findings
Monodoping with N or Mn induces visible light absorption but does not improve activity.
Codoping with Mn and N suppresses charge recombination and enhances mobility.
Mn$_{ extrm{Sr}} extrm{N}_ extrm{O}$ is identified as the most promising doped material.
Abstract
Using the hybrid density functional theory and \textit{ab initio} atomistic thermodynamics, we report monodoping of non-metal (N) or metal (Mn) in SrTiO can induce visible light absorption, but none of them are suitable to ameliorate the photocatalytic activity. Therefore, in order to achieve enhanced photocatalytic activity of SrTiO, we have employed codoped Mn and N simultaneously in SrTiO to modulate its electronic properties effectively. In the codoped SrTiO, the recombination of photogenerated charge carriers is suppressed, and the diffusion and mobility are increased owing to the passivation of discrete localized states. Our results reveal that Mn (codoping of Mn at Sr site and N at O site) is the most promising candidate for enhancing the photocatalytic activity of SrTiO under visible light.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
