
TL;DR
The paper proposes reinterpreting time as a 'cut' rather than a duration, urging a terminological reassessment and exploring the energy required for an object to exist at a different time without interaction.
Contribution
It introduces a novel interpretation of time as a 'cut' and discusses the energy implications of existing at a different time without interaction.
Findings
Reinterpreted time as a 'cut' rather than a duration
Highlighted the need for terminological clarity in physics
Explored the energy required for an object to shift in time without interaction
Abstract
After a short review on the use of time in various branches of physics, I suggest to change the interpretation of time, from a duration to a cut. A reassessment of terminology is also required to avoid meaning traps. I also address the problem of estimating the energy needed by a physical object to shift in time without any other interaction or motion, that is, only to exist.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
