Second-order cone representable slices of the positive semidefinite cone of size three
Gennadiy Averkov

TL;DR
This paper classifies which slices of the 3x3 positive semidefinite cone are second-order cone representable, revealing that low-dimensional slices or those orthogonal to singular matrices are socr.
Contribution
It provides a complete classification of socr slices of S_+^3 based on dimension and orthogonality to singular matrices.
Findings
Slices of S_+^3 with dimension ≤ 4 are socr.
Slices orthogonal to a non-zero singular matrix are socr.
Not all slices of S_+^3 are second-order cone representable.
Abstract
To demonstrate the discrepancy between second-order cone and semidefinite programming, Hamza Fawzi showed that the cone S_+^3 of symmetric positive semidefinite matrices of size 3 is not second-order cone representable (socr). A slice of S_+^3 is intersection of S_+^3 and a linear sub-space of the space S^3 of 3 \times 3 symmetric matrices. It is known that some slices of S_+^3 are socr, while some others are not. We classify socr slices of S_+^3 by showing that a slice of S_+^3 is socr if and if it has dimension at most 4 or is orthogonal to a non-zero singular matrix (where the orthogonality is considered with respect to the standard trace scalar product).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsgraph theory and CDMA systems · Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research · Graph theory and applications
