An Edit-centric Approach for Wikipedia Article Quality Assessment
Edison Marrese-Taylor, Pablo Loyola, Yutaka Matsuo

TL;DR
This paper introduces an edit-centric model for Wikipedia article quality assessment that jointly estimates edit quality and generates descriptive explanations, offering a complementary approach to existing document-based methods.
Contribution
It presents a novel model combining classification and natural language generation to evaluate and explain Wikipedia edits, enhancing interpretability and efficiency.
Findings
Model effectively estimates edit quality
Generates natural language descriptions of edits
Proves feasible and cost-effective in empirical tests
Abstract
We propose an edit-centric approach to assess Wikipedia article quality as a complementary alternative to current full document-based techniques. Our model consists of a main classifier equipped with an auxiliary generative module which, for a given edit, jointly provides an estimation of its quality and generates a description in natural language. We performed an empirical study to assess the feasibility of the proposed model and its cost-effectiveness in terms of data and quality requirements.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsWikis in Education and Collaboration · Cancer-related gene regulation · Natural Language Processing Techniques
