
TL;DR
This paper investigates whether a finitely axiomatized consistent sequential theory can interpret itself along with Tarski biconditionals, providing a framework and discussing related conjectures.
Contribution
It introduces a foundational framework for analyzing Enayat's problem and explores the implications of including Tarski biconditionals in such theories.
Findings
Connected the problem to relevant conjectures
Outlined solution attempts and their limitations
Discussed implications of uniform biconditionals
Abstract
In this paper we study solution attempts for a problem posed by Ali Enayat: can there be a finitely axiomatized consistent sequential theory that interprets itself plus the (sentential or non-uniform) Tarski biconditionals? We provide a basic framework for the study of this question and discuss some solution attempts. We connect the question with some interesting conjectures. We briefly touch upon what happens if we consider uniform biconditionals.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical and Theoretical Analysis · Advanced Topology and Set Theory · History and Theory of Mathematics
