Hardness and approximation for the geodetic set problem in some graph classes
Dibyayan Chakraborty, Florent Foucaud, Harmender Gahlawat, Subir Kumar, Ghosh, Bodhayan Roy

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational difficulty of finding the geodetic number in graphs, proving NP-hardness in certain classes and providing approximation algorithms for general and specific graph families.
Contribution
It establishes NP-hardness of the Minimum Geodetic Set problem on planar and line graphs, and introduces approximation algorithms for general and grid graphs.
Findings
NP-hardness on planar graphs with max degree six
No polynomial-time sublogarithmic approximation unless P=NP
O(√[3]{n} log n)-approximation for general graphs
Abstract
In this paper, we study the computational complexity of finding the \emph{geodetic number} of graphs. A set of vertices of a graph is a \emph{geodetic set} if any vertex of lies in some shortest path between some pair of vertices from . The \textsc{Minimum Geodetic Set (MGS)} problem is to find a geodetic set with minimum cardinality. In this paper, we prove that solving the \textsc{MGS} problem is NP-hard on planar graphs with a maximum degree six and line graphs. We also show that unless , there is no polynomial time algorithm to solve the \textsc{MGS} problem with sublogarithmic approximation factor (in terms of the number of vertices) even on graphs with diameter . On the positive side, we give an -approximation algorithm for the \textsc{MGS} problem on general graphs of order . We also give a -approximation algorithm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
