Transfer Learning using CNN for Handwritten Devanagari Character Recognition
Nagender Aneja, Sandhya Aneja

TL;DR
This study evaluates various pre-trained CNN models for handwritten Devanagari character recognition using transfer learning, finding Inception V3 achieves the highest accuracy while AlexNet is the fastest.
Contribution
It compares multiple pre-trained CNN architectures for Devanagari character recognition, highlighting their accuracy and training efficiency.
Findings
Inception V3 achieves 99% accuracy.
AlexNet trains faster with 98% accuracy.
Transfer learning effectively recognizes handwritten Devanagari characters.
Abstract
This paper presents an analysis of pre-trained models to recognize handwritten Devanagari alphabets using transfer learning for Deep Convolution Neural Network (DCNN). This research implements AlexNet, DenseNet, Vgg, and Inception ConvNet as a fixed feature extractor. We implemented 15 epochs for each of AlexNet, DenseNet 121, DenseNet 201, Vgg 11, Vgg 16, Vgg 19, and Inception V3. Results show that Inception V3 performs better in terms of accuracy achieving 99% accuracy with average epoch time 16.3 minutes while AlexNet performs fastest with 2.2 minutes per epoch and achieving 98\% accuracy.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsBatch Normalization · Average Pooling · Local Response Normalization · Concatenated Skip Connection · Global Average Pooling · Dense Block · Grouped Convolution · Kaiming Initialization · 1x1 Convolution · Dropout
