Robust, Expressive, and Quantitative Linear Temporal Logics: Pick any Two for Free
Daniel Neider (Max Planck Institute for Software Systems), Alexander, Weinert (German Aerospace Center (DLR), Simulation, Software Technology),, Martin Zimmermann (University of Liverpool)

TL;DR
This paper introduces new combined linear temporal logics that simultaneously address expressiveness, quantitative features, and robustness, maintaining the efficient algorithmic properties of standard LTL.
Contribution
It presents combined logics integrating Linear Dynamic Logic, Prompt-LTL, and robust LTL, enabling multiple shortcomings to be addressed together with preserved algorithmic efficiency.
Findings
New logics retain LTL's algorithmic properties.
Combined logics handle multiple shortcomings simultaneously.
Efficient algorithms applicable to the new logics.
Abstract
Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) is the standard specification language for reactive systems and is successfully applied in industrial settings. However, many shortcomings of LTL have been identified in the literature, among them the limited expressiveness, the lack of quantitative features, and the inability to express robustness. There is work on overcoming these shortcomings, but each of these is typically addressed in isolation. This is insufficient for applications where all shortcomings manifest themselves simultaneously. Here, we tackle this issue by introducing logics that address more than one shortcoming. To this end, we combine the logics Linear Dynamic Logic, Prompt-LTL, and robust LTL, each addressing one aspect, to new logics. For all combinations of two aspects, the resulting logic has the same desirable algorithmic properties as plain LTL. In particular, the highly efficient…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
