Comment on "An improved upper limit on the neutrino mass from a direct kinematic method by KATRIN"
Alan Chodos

TL;DR
This paper critiques the statistical analysis of KATRIN's neutrino mass measurement, questioning why negative mass squared values are excluded despite their physical plausibility.
Contribution
It highlights a potential oversight in the KATRIN analysis methodology regarding negative mass squared values.
Findings
Negative mass squared values occur in KATRIN data.
Exclusion of negative values may bias the results.
Questioning standard analysis practices in neutrino mass experiments.
Abstract
We note that the central value of the KATRIN measurement has negative mass squared, and wonder why the statistical analysis excludes such values a priori.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeutrino Physics Research · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
