The Pristine Survey -- VI. The first three years of medium-resolution follow-up spectroscopy of Pristine EMP star candidates
David S. Aguado, Kris Youakim, Jonay I. Gonz\'alez Hern\'andez, Carlos, Allende Prieto, Else Starkenburg, Nicolas Martin, Piercarlo Bonifacio, Anke, Arentsen, Elisabetta Caffau, Luis Peralta de Arriba, Federico Sestito, Rafael, Garcia-Diaz, Nicholas Fantin, Vanessa Hill

TL;DR
This paper reports on a three-year medium-resolution spectroscopic survey of Pristine EMP star candidates, identifying over 800 new very metal-poor stars and analyzing their carbon enhancement, thereby advancing the search for ancient stars.
Contribution
The study provides the first large-scale spectroscopic follow-up of Pristine survey candidates, significantly expanding the catalog of known EMP stars and refining success rates for identifying such stars.
Findings
Identified 707 new very metal-poor stars with [Fe/H] < -2.0.
Discovered 95 new extremely metal-poor stars with [Fe/H] < -3.0.
Reported high carbon enhancement fractions among the most metal-poor stars.
Abstract
We present the results of a 3-year long, medium-resolution spectroscopic campaign aimed at identifying very metal-poor stars from candidates selected with the CaHK, metallicity-sensitive Pristine survey. The catalogue consists of a total of 1007 stars, and includes 146 rediscoveries of metal-poor stars already presented in previous surveys, 707 new very metal-poor stars with [Fe/H] < -2.0, and 95 new extremely metal-poor stars with [Fe/H] < -3.0. We provide a spectroscopic [Fe/H] for every star in the catalogue, and [C/Fe] measurements for a subset of the stars (10% with [Fe/H] < -3 and 24% with -3 < [Fe/H] < -2) for which a carbon determination is possible, contingent mainly on the carbon abundance, effective temperature and S/N of the stellar spectra. We find an average carbon enhancement fraction ([C/Fe] >= +0.7) of 41 +- 4% for stars with -3 < [Fe/H] < -2 and 58 +- 14% for stars…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
