Interictal intracranial EEG for predicting surgical success: the importance of space and time
Yujiang Wang, Nishant Sinha, Gabrielle M. Schroeder, Sriharsha, Ramaraju, Andrew W. McEvoy, Anna Miserocchi, Jane de Tisi, Fahmida A., Chowdhury, Beate Diehl, John S. Duncan, Peter N. Taylor

TL;DR
This study improves prediction of surgical success in epilepsy by normalizing for electrode proximity, considering coverage extent, and accounting for temporal variations in intracranial EEG networks.
Contribution
It introduces methods to address spatial bias, coverage differences, and temporal dynamics in interictal EEG analysis for better outcome prediction.
Findings
Normalizing for spatial proximity enhances prediction accuracy.
Greater electrode coverage correlates with higher prediction success.
Predictions remain robust across different time segments.
Abstract
Predicting post-operative seizure freedom using functional correlation networks derived from interictal intracranial EEG has shown some success. However, there are important challenges to consider. 1: electrodes physically closer to each other naturally tend to be more correlated causing a spatial bias. 2: implantation location and number of electrodes differ between patients, making cross-subject comparisons difficult. 3: functional correlation networks can vary over time but are currently assumed as static. In this study we address these three substantial challenges using intracranial EEG data from 55 patients with intractable focal epilepsy. Patients additionally underwent preoperative MR imaging, intra-operative CT, and post-operative MRI allowing accurate localisation of electrodes and delineation of removed tissue. We show that normalising for spatial proximity between nearby…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
