The main sequence of star forming galaxies II. A non evolving slope at the high mass end
P. Popesso, L. Morselli, A. Concas, C. Schreiber, G. Rodighiero, G., Cresci, S. Belli, O. Ilbert, G. Erfanianfar, C. Mancini, H. Inami, M., Dickinson, M. Pannella, D. Elbaz

TL;DR
This study examines the evolution of the star-forming main sequence from redshift 0 to 2.5, revealing a consistent slope with a shift in SFR, a bending at high mass, and the importance of selection effects.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the main sequence slope remains consistent over time when accounting for selection effects, and characterizes the distribution of star-forming galaxies across redshifts and masses.
Findings
Main sequence slope is consistent with local relation, scaled by (1+z)^{3.2}
Bending observed at high stellar masses
Distribution of galaxies is log-normal with starbursts as tails
Abstract
By using the deepest available mid and far infrared surveys in the CANDELS, GOODS and COSMOS fields we study the evolution of the Main Sequence (MS) of star forming galaxies (SFGs) from z~0 to` ~2.5 at stellar masses larger than 10^{10} M_{\odot}. The MS slope and scatter are consistent with a re-scaled version of the local relation and distribution, shifted at higher values of SFR according to ~(1+z)^{3.2}. The relation exhibits a bending at the high mass end and a slightly increasing scatter as a function of the stellar mass. We show that the previously reported evolution of the MS slope, in the considered mass and redshift range, is due to a selection effect. The distribution of galaxies in the MS region at fixed stellar mass is well represented by a single log-normal distribution at all redshifts and masses, with starburst galaxies (SBs) occupying the tail at high SFR.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
