Novel Methods for the Analysis of Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials

TL;DR

This paper introduces novel, less assumption-dependent analysis methods for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials, enhancing robustness and power compared to traditional model-based approaches.

Contribution

It proposes non-parametric and hybrid methods, including synthetic control and within-cluster crossover techniques, to improve analysis robustness and power in SW-CRTs.

Findings

Methods improve robustness to model misspecification

Hybrid approaches enhance statistical power

Simulations demonstrate effectiveness in various settings

Abstract

Stepped wedge cluster randomized trials (SW-CRTs) have become increasingly popular and are used for a variety of interventions and outcomes, often chosen for their feasibility advantages. SW-CRTs must account for time trends in the outcome because of the staggered rollout of the intervention inherent in the design. Robust inference procedures and non-parametric analysis methods have recently been proposed to handle such trends without requiring strong parametric modeling assumptions, but these are less powerful than model-based approaches. We propose several novel analysis methods that reduce reliance on modeling assumptions while preserving some of the increased power provided by the use of mixed effects models. In one method, we use the synthetic control approach to find the best matching clusters for a given intervention cluster. This approach can improve the power of the analysis but is fully non-parametric. Another method makes use of within-cluster crossover information to construct an overall estimator. We also consider methods that combine these approaches to further improve power. We test these methods on simulated SW-CRTs and identify settings for which these methods gain robustness to model misspecification while retaining some of the power advantages of mixed effects models. Finally, we propose avenues for future research on the use of these methods; motivation for such research arises from their flexibility, which allows the identification of specific causal contrasts of interest, their robustness, and the potential for incorporating covariates to further increase power. Investigators conducting SW-CRTs might well consider such methods when common modeling assumptions may not hold.