Benchmarking Semiclassical and Perturbative Methods for Real-time Simulations of Cavity-Bound Emission and Interference
Norah M. Hoffmann, Christian Sch\"afer, Niko S\"akkinen, Angel Rubio,, Heiko Appel, Aaron Kelly

TL;DR
This paper benchmarks semiclassical and perturbative methods for simulating strong light-matter interactions in quantum cavities, highlighting their accuracy and limitations in capturing correlated dynamics and interference effects.
Contribution
It systematically compares multiple approximate and perturbative techniques for modeling cavity-bound atomic systems with strong coupling and interference.
Findings
Most methods accurately model correlated light-matter dynamics.
Fewest switches surface hopping performs less well in interference scenarios.
Many semiclassical methods struggle to fully capture interference effects.
Abstract
We benchmark a selection of semiclassical and perturbative dynamics techniques by investigating the correlated evolution of a cavity-bound atomic system to assess their applicability to study problems involving strong light-matter interactions in quantum cavities. The model system of interest features spontaneous emission, interference, and strong coupling behaviour, and necessitates the consideration of vacuum fluctuations and correlated light-matter dynamics. We compare a selection of approximate dynamics approaches including fewest switches surface hopping, multi-trajectory Ehrenfest dynamics, linearized semiclasical dynamics, and partially linearized semiclassical dynamics. Furthermore, investigating self-consistent perturbative methods, we apply the Bogoliubov-Born-Green-Kirkwood-Yvon hierarchy in the second Born approximation. With the exception of fewest switches surface hopping,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
