Two years of non-thermal emission from the binary neutron star merger GW170817: rapid fading of the jet afterglow and first constraints on the kilonova fastest ejecta
A. Hajela, R. Margutti, K. D. Alexander, A. Kathirgamaraju, A., Baldeschi, C. Guidorzi, D. Giannios, W. Fong, Y. Wu, A. MacFadyen, A. Paggi,, E. Berger, P. K. Blanchard, R. Chornock, D. L. Coppejans, P. S., Cowperthwaite, T. Eftekhari, S. Gomez, G. Hosseinzadeh, T. Laskar, B. D.

TL;DR
This study analyzes late-time X-ray and radio observations of GW170817, revealing a rapidly fading off-axis jet, constraining the merger environment density, and providing insights into the kilonova ejecta's synchrotron emission properties.
Contribution
It introduces a new method to estimate the merger environment density and refines jet and ejecta parameters using extensive late-time observations.
Findings
The non-thermal emission decays steeply as $t^{-1.95}$.
The environment density is constrained to $n \,\le 9.6 \times 10^{-3} \,\rm{cm^{-3}}$.
Shallow stratification indexes $\\alpha \le 6$ are disfavored for kilonova ejecta.
Abstract
We present Chandra and VLA observations of GW170817 at ~521-743 days post merger, and a homogeneous analysis of the entire Chandra data set. We find that the late-time non-thermal emission follows the expected evolution from an off-axis relativistic jet, with a steep temporal decay and a simple power-law spectrum . We present a new method to constrain the merger environment density based on diffuse X-ray emission from hot plasma in the host galaxy and we find . This measurement is independent from inferences based on the jet afterglow modeling and allows us to partially solve for model degeneracies. The updated best-fitting model parameters with this density constraint are a fireball kinetic energy ($E_{iso}=…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
