A nation's foreign and domestic professors: which have better research performance? (The Italian case)
Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Flavia Di Costa

TL;DR
This study compares research performance of foreign and Italian professors in Italy, finding foreign faculty often outperform locals, especially among associate professors, with implications for national policy and talent attraction.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of foreign faculty research performance in Italy, highlighting performance differences and policy implications.
Findings
Foreign professors constitute 1% of faculty, with performance often better than Italians.
Psychology has the highest concentration of top foreign scientists.
Some foreign professors are unproductive or mediocre.
Abstract
This work investigates the research performance of foreign faculty in the Italian academic system. Incoming professors compose l'1% of total faculty across the sciences, although with variations by discipline. Their scientific performance measured over 2010-2014 is on average better than that of their Italian colleagues: the greatest difference is for associate professors. Psychology is the discipline with the greatest concentration of top foreign scientists. However there are notable shares of unproductive foreign professors or of those with mediocre performance. The findings stimulate reflection on issues of national policy concerning attractiveness of the higher education system to skilled people from abroad, given the ongoing heavy Italian brain drain.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
