Oracle complexity classes and local measurements on physical Hamiltonians
Sevag Gharibian, Stephen Piddock, and Justin Yirka

TL;DR
This paper investigates the complexity of simulating local measurements on ground states of local Hamiltonians, establishing that this problem remains computationally hard even for physically motivated and 1D systems, with implications for quantum complexity theory.
Contribution
It proves that APX-SIM is P^QMA[log]-complete for various physically relevant Hamiltonians, including 2D and 1D models, extending previous complexity results.
Findings
APX-SIM is P^QMA[log]-complete for physically motivated Hamiltonians.
Complexity classification of APX-SIM varies with Hamiltonian types, including P, P^||NP, P^||StoqMA, P^||QMA.
APX-SIM remains hard for 1D Hamiltonians on an 8-dimensional qudit chain.
Abstract
The canonical problem for the class Quantum Merlin-Arthur (QMA) is that of estimating ground state energies of local Hamiltonians. Perhaps surprisingly, [Ambainis, CCC 2014] showed that the related, but arguably more natural, problem of simulating local measurements on ground states of local Hamiltonians (APX-SIM) is likely harder than QMA. Indeed, [Ambainis, CCC 2014] showed that APX-SIM is P^QMA[log]-complete, for P^QMA[log] the class of languages decidable by a P machine making a logarithmic number of adaptive queries to a QMA oracle. In this work, we show that APX-SIM is P^QMA[log]-complete even when restricted to more physical Hamiltonians, obtaining as intermediate steps a variety of related complexity-theoretic results. We first give a sequence of results which together yield P^QMA[log]-hardness for APX-SIM on well-motivated Hamiltonians: (1) We show that for NP, StoqMA, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
