G4.8+6.2, a possible kilonova remnant?
Yu Liu, Yuan-Chuan Zou, Bing Jiang, He Gao, Shuai-Bing Ma, Bin Liao

TL;DR
This paper explores the possibility that the G4.8+6.2 remnant is a kilonova remnant linked to the AD 1163 guest star, suggesting young KNRs may have distinct observational features, but definitive proof requires further data.
Contribution
It proposes a potential historical association between G4.8+6.2 and a kilonova event from AD 1163, offering a new perspective on identifying young kilonova remnants.
Findings
G4.8+6.2 may be a kilonova remnant associated with AD 1163
Young KNRs could have large diameters and low surface brightness
Further observations are necessary to confirm the hypothesis
Abstract
Kilonova explosions typically release erg in kinetic energy, which is sufficient to constitute a kilonova remnant (KNR); however, it has not yet been confirmed. In this work, we investigate the probable association between G4.8+6.2 and the guest star of AD 1163, which is recorded by the Korea ancient astronomers. Although the evidence available is insufficient to draw a definite conclusion, it is at least theoretically self-consistent that the guest star of AD 1163 was a historical kilonova associated with G4.8+6.2, considering the possible short visible timescale of AD 1163, the relatively high Galactic latitude of G4.8+6.2, and that G4.8+6.2 is spatially coincident with the guest star of AD 1163. Further observation of G4.8+6.2 is needed to test our hypothesis. If our interpretation is correct, our results indicate that young KNRs should have a large diameter and low…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
