In Defense of LSTMs for Addressing Multiple Instance Learning Problems
Kaili Wang, Jose Oramas, Tinne Tuytelaars

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that LSTMs are highly effective for multiple instance learning tasks, even with unordered data, and can learn instance-level information using only bag-level labels, outperforming some specialized methods.
Contribution
It shows that LSTMs can be effectively applied to MIL problems, capturing instance-level info with weak supervision, which is a novel application for this model type.
Findings
LSTMs perform well on MIL tasks across various datasets.
LSTMs can learn instance-level predictions with only bag-level annotations.
Their performance approaches that of fully-supervised methods.
Abstract
LSTMs have a proven track record in analyzing sequential data. But what about unordered instance bags, as found under a Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) setting? While not often used for this, we show LSTMs excell under this setting too. In addition, we show thatLSTMs are capable of indirectly capturing instance-level information us-ing only bag-level annotations. Thus, they can be used to learn instance-level models in a weakly supervised manner. Our empirical evaluation on both simplified (MNIST) and realistic (Lookbook and Histopathology) datasets shows that LSTMs are competitive with or even surpass state-of-the-art methods specially designed for handling specific MIL problems. Moreover, we show that their performance on instance-level prediction is close to that of fully-supervised methods.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Data Classification · AI in cancer detection · Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
MethodsSigmoid Activation · Tanh Activation · Long Short-Term Memory
