A geometrically based criterion to avoid infimum-gaps in Optimal Control
Michele Palladino, Franco Rampazzo

TL;DR
This paper introduces a geometric criterion based on control family abundance and normality to prevent infimum gaps in optimal control problems, extending previous results beyond convex dynamics.
Contribution
It establishes a general, non-convex condition involving control family abundance and normality that guarantees the absence of infimum gaps in optimal control.
Findings
Normality implies no infimum gap under control family abundance.
Introduces a non-convex, dynamical-topological notion of abundance.
Proves an open mapping theorem for Quasi-Differential-Quotient cones.
Abstract
In optimal control theory the expression infimum gap means a strictly negative difference between the infimum value of a given minimum problem and the infimum value of a new problem obtained by the former by extending the original family V of controls to a larger family W. Now, for some classes of domain-extensions -- like convex relaxation or impulsive embedding of unbounded control problems -- the normality of an extended minimizer has been shown to be sufficient for the avoidance of an infimum gaps. A natural issue is then the search of a general hypothesis under which the criterium 'normality implies no gap' holds true. We prove that, far from being a peculiarity of those specific extensions and from requiring the convexity of the extended dynamics, this criterium is valid provided the original family V of controls is abundant in the extended family W. Abundance, which is stronger…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
