Trust and Cognitive Load During Human-Robot Interaction
Muneeb Imtiaz Ahmad, Jasmin Bernotat, Katrin Lohan, Friederike Eyssel

TL;DR
This study explores how cognitive load, robot anthropomorphism, and error rates influence human trust during collaborative game-based human-robot interactions, revealing complex relationships and perceptions.
Contribution
It provides new insights into how physical robot appearance and error rates affect trust and cognitive load in human-robot collaboration.
Findings
Trust decreases as cognitive load increases.
Participants trusted Pepper more under high error-rate conditions.
Husky was perceived as more trustworthy at low error-rates.
Abstract
This paper presents an exploratory study to understand the relationship between a humans' cognitive load, trust, and anthropomorphism during human-robot interaction. To understand the relationship, we created a \say{Matching the Pair} game that participants could play collaboratively with one of two robot types, Husky or Pepper. The goal was to understand if humans would trust the robot as a teammate while being in the game-playing situation that demanded a high level of cognitive load. Using a humanoid vs. a technical robot, we also investigated the impact of physical anthropomorphism and we furthermore tested the impact of robot error rate on subsequent judgments and behavior. Our results showed that there was an inversely proportional relationship between trust and cognitive load, suggesting that as the amount of cognitive load increased in the participants, their ratings of trust…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSocial Robot Interaction and HRI · AI in Service Interactions · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
