TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that heuristic sampling is not necessary for training deep object detectors and introduces a simple, hyperparameter-free Sampling-Free mechanism that improves accuracy by addressing classification gradient imbalance.
Contribution
The paper reveals that classification gradient imbalance, not sampling, causes accuracy degradation and proposes a hyperparameter-free method to improve training without heuristic sampling.
Findings
Sampling-Free method outperforms heuristic sampling on COCO and PASCAL VOC.
The approach achieves higher detection accuracy without hyperparameter tuning.
Addressing gradient imbalance is key to training accurate detectors.
Abstract
To train accurate deep object detectors under the extreme foreground-background imbalance, heuristic sampling methods are always necessary, which either re-sample a subset of all training samples (hard sampling methods, \eg biased sampling, OHEM), or use all training samples but re-weight them discriminatively (soft sampling methods, \eg Focal Loss, GHM). In this paper, we challenge the necessity of such hard/soft sampling methods for training accurate deep object detectors. While previous studies have shown that training detectors without heuristic sampling methods would significantly degrade accuracy, we reveal that this degradation comes from an unreasonable classification gradient magnitude caused by the imbalance, rather than a lack of re-sampling/re-weighting. Motivated by our discovery, we propose a simple yet effective \emph{Sampling-Free} mechanism to achieve a reasonable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsFocal Loss
