Visible spectroscopy from the Mission Accessible Near-Earth Object Survey (MANOS): Taxonomic dependence on asteroid size
Maxime Devogele, Nicholas Moskovitz, Audrey Thirouin, Annika, Gustaffson, Mitchell Magnuson, Cristina Thomas, Mark Willman, Eric, Christensen, Michael Person, Richard Binzel, David Polishook, Francesca, DeMeo, Mary Hinkle, David Trilling, Michael Mommert, Brian Burt, and Brian

TL;DR
This study presents the first results of the MANOS visible spectroscopic survey of small NEOs, revealing size-dependent variations in asteroid taxonomy and suggesting planetary encounters influence asteroid surface properties.
Contribution
It provides the first taxonomic distribution of small NEOs from MANOS, highlighting size-dependent differences and the influence of planetary encounters on asteroid taxonomy.
Findings
Lower fraction of S+Q asteroids (~43.8%) in small NEOs compared to larger objects.
Higher fractions of X-complex and A-type asteroids (~23.8% and 3.8%) in small NEOs.
Strong correlation between Q/S ratio and perihelion distance, linked to Venus encounters.
Abstract
The Mission Accessible Near-Earth Object Survey (MANOS) aims to observe and characterize small (mean absolute magnitude H ~ 25 mag) Near-Earth Objects (NEOs) that are accessible by spacecraft (mean ~ 5.7 km/s) and that make close approaches with the Earth (mean Minimum Orbital Intersection Distance MOID ~ 0.03 AU). We present here the first results of the MANOS visible spectroscopic survey. The spectra were obtained from August 2013 to March 2018 at Lowell Observatory's Discovery Channel 4.3 meter telescope, and both Gemini North and South facilities. In total, 210 NEOs have been observed and taxonomically classified. Our taxonomic distribution shows significant variations with respect to surveys of larger objects. We suspect these to be due to a dependence of Main Belt source regions on object size. Compared to previous surveys of larger objects (Binzel et al. 2019, 2004;…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
