Constraining structure formation using EDGES

TL;DR

This paper investigates how different dark matter models affect early star formation and the resulting 21-cm hydrogen absorption signal, using simulations to constrain models based on EDGES observations.

Contribution

It combines structure formation simulations with star formation models to constrain warm dark matter properties using EDGES 21-cm data.

Findings

A 4.3 keV WDM model aligns with EDGES timing for low star formation efficiency.

A 3 keV WDM model requires higher star formation efficiency, exceeding current predictions.

DMF models produce a faster onset of 21-cm absorption compared to CDM.

Abstract

The experiment to detect the global epoch of reionization signature (EDGES) collaboration reported the detection of a line at 78MHz in the sky-averaged spectrum due to neutral hydrogen (HI) 21-cm hyperfine absorption of cosmic microwave background photons at $z\sim 17$. This requires that the spin temperature of HI be coupled to the kinetic temperature of the gas at this $z$ through the scattering of Ly-$\alpha$ photons emitted by massive stars. To explain the experimental result, star formation needs to be sufficiently efficient at $z\sim 17$ and this can be used to constrain models in which small-scale structure formation is suppressed (DMF models), either due to dark matter free-streaming or non-standard inflationary dynamics. We combine simulations of structure formation with a simple recipe for star formation to investigate whether these models emit enough Ly-$\alpha$ photons to reproduce the experimental signal for reasonable values of the star formation efficiency, $f_\star$. We find that a thermal warm dark matter (WDM) model with mass $m_\mathrm{WDM}\sim 4.3\,\mathrm{keV}$ is consistent with the timing of the signal for $f_\star\lesssim 2\%$. The exponential growth of structure around $z\sim 17$ in such a model naturally generates a sharp onset of the absorption. A warmer model with $m_\mathrm{WDM}\sim 3\,\mathrm{keV}$ requires a higher star formation efficiency, $f_\star\sim 6\%$, which is a factor of few above predictions of current star formation models and observations of satellites in the Milky Way. However, uncertainties in the process of star formation at these $z$ do not allow to derive strong constrains on such models using 21-cm absorption line. The onset of the 21-cm absorption is generally faster in DMF compared to cold dark matter (CDM), unless some process significantly suppresses star formation in halos with masses below $\sim 10^8\,h^{-1}\,\mathrm{M}_\odot$.