Incompleteness Ex Machina
Sebastian Oberhoff

TL;DR
This paper provides two proofs of G"odel's incompleteness theorems, one classical and one computational, clarifying the distinction between the transport of computation into arithmetic and the theorems themselves.
Contribution
It offers a novel perspective by splitting G"odel's work into two conceptual parts and provides dual proofs, including a computational approach.
Findings
Proofs of G"odel's incompleteness theorems in two different frameworks
Clarification of the conceptual distinction in G"odel's work
Insight into the relationship between computation and arithmetic
Abstract
In this essay we'll prove G\"odel's incompleteness theorems twice. First, we'll prove them the good old-fashioned way. Then we'll repeat the feat in the setting of computation. In the process we'll discover that G\"odel's work, rightly viewed, needs to be split into two parts: the transport of computation into the arena of arithmetic on the one hand and the actual incompleteness theorems on the other. After we're done there will be cake.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Logic, programming, and type systems
