The Evolution of Decentralized ICT Networks

TL;DR

This paper discusses the shift from centralized to decentralized ICT networks, demonstrating through probability theory that decentralized designs like Spine Leaf and SDN are more resilient and efficient than traditional topologies.

Contribution

It proves the advantages of decentralization over centralization and shows how Spine Leaf and SDN are inherently decentralized and superior.

Findings

Decentralization offers better resilience and redundancy.

Spine Leaf and SDN are inherently decentralized.

Decentralized networks outperform traditional topologies.

Abstract

Traditional networking systems, especially the famous 3 tier topology design, focused more on centralizing the networking systems, and used redundancy as a protection mechanism against future failures of the system. However, in recent years, the evolution of decentralization has taken place through several design techniques. Starting with clients requiring physically separate networks for critical applications. And then emerged the Spine Leaf topology and the Software Defined Network solutions. In this research paper, I will first, prove how decentralization is better than centralization using aspects of probability theory. Second, I will go further and show how the Spine Leaf and Software Defined Networks are inherently decentralized, redundant and are better than the traditional centralized networks.