Generalized List Decoding

TL;DR

This paper characterizes when positive rate list decoding is possible for general adversarial channels, using tensor cones and hypergraph methods, advancing understanding of list decoding limits and capacities.

Contribution

It provides a precise criterion for list decoding feasibility on general channels, extending classical bounds and introducing new tensor-based duality techniques.

Findings

Characterization of list decoding existence via tensor cone containment

Extension of Plotkin bound to list decoding for general channels

Determination of list decoding capacity for large list sizes

Abstract

This paper concerns itself with the question of list decoding for general adversarial channels, e.g., bit-flip ($\textsf{XOR}$) channels, erasure channels, $\textsf{AND}$ ($Z$-) channels, $\textsf{OR}$ channels, real adder channels, noisy typewriter channels, etc. We precisely characterize when exponential-sized (or positive rate) $(L-1)$-list decodable codes (where the list size $L$ is a universal constant) exist for such channels. Our criterion asserts that: "For any given general adversarial channel, it is possible to construct positive rate $(L-1)$-list decodable codes if and only if the set of completely positive tensors of order-$L$ with admissible marginals is not entirely contained in the order-$L$ confusability set associated to the channel." The sufficiency is shown via random code construction (combined with expurgation or time-sharing). The necessity is shown by 1. extracting equicoupled subcodes (generalization of equidistant code) from any large code sequence using hypergraph Ramsey's theorem, and 2. significantly extending the classic Plotkin bound in coding theory to list decoding for general channels using duality between the completely positive tensor cone and the copositive tensor cone. In the proof, we also obtain a new fact regarding asymmetry of joint distributions, which be may of independent interest. Other results include 1. List decoding capacity with asymptotically large $L$ for general adversarial channels; 2. A tight list size bound for most constant composition codes (generalization of constant weight codes); 3. Rederivation and demystification of Blinovsky's [Bli86] characterization of the list decoding Plotkin points (threshold at which large codes are impossible); 4. Evaluation of general bounds ([WBBJ]) for unique decoding in the error correction code setting.