Background evaluations for the chiral magnetic effect with normalized correlators using a multiphase transport model
Subikash Choudhury, Gang Wang, Wanbing He, Yu Hu, and Huan Zhong Huang

TL;DR
This study uses a multiphase transport model to evaluate background contributions to charge-dependent correlations in heavy-ion collisions, questioning the assumption that normalized third-order correlators can estimate backgrounds in CME searches.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of charge-dependent correlators using AMPT, challenging previous assumptions about their normalization and background estimation in CME experiments.
Findings
Normalized $oldsymbol{ ext{γ}}_{112}$ and $oldsymbol{ ext{γ}}_{123}$ are not equal in AMPT simulations.
The AMPT model does not support the assumption that $oldsymbol{ ext{γ}}_{123}$ can serve as a background estimate for $oldsymbol{ ext{γ}}_{112}$.
Relations between different $oldsymbol{ ext{γ}}$ correlators are discussed within the model.
Abstract
The chiral magnetic effect (CME) induces an electric charge separation in a chiral medium along the magnetic field that is mostly produced by spectator protons in heavy-ion collisions. The experimental searches for the CME, based on the charge-dependent angular correlations (), however, have remained inconclusive, because the non-CME background contributions are not well understood. Experimentally, the correlators have been measured with respect to the second-order () and the third-order () symmetry planes, defined as and , respectively. The expectation was that with a proper normalization, would provide a data-driven estimate for the background contributions in . In this work, we calculate different harmonics of the correlators using a charge-conserving version of a multiphase…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
