Physics without Determinism: Alternative Interpretations of Classical Physics
Flavio Del Santo, Nicolas Gisin

TL;DR
This paper challenges the deterministic view of classical physics by proposing that indeterminism can be integrated through finite information quantities, linking classical and quantum interpretations and exploring implications for emergence and measurement.
Contribution
It introduces a novel indeterministic interpretation of classical physics based on finite information quantities, contrasting with traditional infinite-precision assumptions.
Findings
Classical physics can be modeled with finite information quantities.
Indeterministic interpretations relate to quantum measurement problems.
Potential for new emergence and causation theories in physics.
Abstract
Classical physics is generally regarded as deterministic, as opposed to quantum mechanics that is considered the first theory to have introduced genuine indeterminism into physics. We challenge this view by arguing that the alleged determinism of classical physics relies on the tacit, metaphysical assumption that there exists an actual value of every physical quantity, with its infinite predetermined digits (which we name \emph{principle of infinite precision}). Building on recent information-theoretic arguments showing that the principle of infinite precision (which translates into the attribution of a physical meaning to mathematical real numbers) leads to unphysical consequences, we consider possible alternative indeterministic interpretations of classical physics. We also link those to well-known interpretations of quantum mechanics. In particular, we propose a model of classical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
