Regular mappings and non-existence of bi-Lipschitz embeddings for slit carpets
Guy C. David, Sylvester Eriksson-Bique

TL;DR
This paper proves that slit carpets cannot be bi-Lipschitz embedded into any uniformly convex Banach space, including Euclidean spaces and L^p spaces, resolving a longstanding open question.
Contribution
It establishes the non-embeddability of slit carpets into uniformly convex Banach spaces, answering a question posed in 1997.
Findings
Slit carpets do not admit bi-Lipschitz embeddings into uniformly convex Banach spaces.
Includes Euclidean spaces and L^p spaces for p in (1,∞).
Resolves Question 8 from Heinonen and Semmes' 1997 list.
Abstract
We prove that the "slit carpet" introduced by Merenkov does not admit a bi-Lipschitz embedding into any uniformly convex Banach space. In particular, this includes any Euclidean space , but also spaces such as for . This resolves Question 8 in the 1997 list by Heinonen and Semmes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
