2.5-D retrieval of atmospheric properties from exoplanet phase curves: Application to WASP-43b observations

TL;DR

This paper introduces a 2.5-D retrieval method for exoplanet phase curves that models atmospheric properties across the planet's surface more realistically than traditional 1-D models, demonstrated on WASP-43b data.

Contribution

The novel 2.5-D approach retrieves atmospheric properties at all longitudes and latitudes simultaneously, improving over the traditional 1-D assumption.

Findings

2.5-D model fits synthetic data more realistically than 1-D.

WASP-43b's dayside is much hotter than the nightside, possibly due to thick clouds.

Water vapor abundance is constrained; CO abundance remains degenerate.

Abstract

We present a novel retrieval technique that attempts to model phase curve observations of exoplanets more realistically and reliably, which we call the 2.5-dimension (2.5-D) approach. In our 2.5-D approach we retrieve the vertical temperature profile and mean gaseous abundance of a planet at all longitudes and latitudes \textbf{simultaneously}, assuming that the temperature or composition, $x$, at a particular longitude and latitude $(\Lambda,\Phi)$ is given by $x(\Lambda,\Phi) = \bar{x} + (x(\Lambda,0) - \bar{x})\cos^n\Phi$, where $\bar{x}$ is the mean of the morning and evening terminator values of $x(\Lambda,0)$, and $n$ is an assumed coefficient. We compare our new 2.5-D scheme with the more traditional 1-D approach, which assumes the same temperature profile and gaseous abundances at all points on the visible disc of a planet for each individual phase observation, using a set of synthetic phase curves generated from a GCM-based simulation. We find that our 2.5-D model fits these data more realistically than the 1-D approach, confining the hotter regions of the planet more closely to the dayside. We then apply both models to WASP-43b phase curve observations of HST/WFC3 and Spitzer/IRAC. We find that the dayside of WASP-43b is apparently much hotter than the nightside and show that this could be explained by the presence of a thick cloud on the nightside with a cloud top at pressure $< 0.2$ bar. We further show that while the mole fraction of water vapour is reasonably well constrained to $(1-10)\times10^{-4}$, the abundance of CO is very difficult to constrain with these data since it is degenerate with temperature and prone to possible systematic radiometric differences between the HST/WFC3 and Spitzer/IRAC observations. Hence, it is difficult to reliably constrain C/O.