(Un)informed Consent: Studying GDPR Consent Notices in the Field
Christine Utz, Martin Degeling, Sascha Fahl, Florian Schaub, and Thorsten Holz

TL;DR
This study investigates how design and framing of GDPR cookie consent notices influence user interactions and choices, highlighting the importance of clear, unbiased consent mechanisms for truly informed user decisions.
Contribution
The paper provides empirical evidence on how notice placement, choice type, and nudging affect user consent behavior, informing better regulatory guidelines.
Findings
Notice position affects user interaction likelihood.
Choice mechanism influences acceptance rates.
Nudging significantly impacts user decisions.
Abstract
Since the adoption of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in May 2018 more than 60 % of popular websites in Europe display cookie consent notices to their visitors. This has quickly led to users becoming fatigued with privacy notifications and contributed to the rise of both browser extensions that block these banners and demands for a solution that bundles consent across multiple websites or in the browser. In this work, we identify common properties of the graphical user interface of consent notices and conduct three experiments with more than 80,000 unique users on a German website to investigate the influence of notice position, type of choice, and content framing on consent. We find that users are more likely to interact with a notice shown in the lower (left) part of the screen. Given a binary choice, more users are willing to accept tracking compared to mechanisms…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
