Causal Effects of Brevity on Style and Success in Social Media
Kristina Gligoric, Ashton Anderson, Robert West

TL;DR
This study experimentally investigates how reducing message length affects success in social media, finding that concise messages up to 30-40% shorter tend to be more successful, with optimal shortening around 10-20%.
Contribution
It provides causal evidence on the impact of brevity on message success through controlled experiments, unlike prior observational studies.
Findings
Concise messages are more successful up to 30-40% length reduction.
Optimal length reduction is between 10% and 20%.
The effect is strongest among daily social media users.
Abstract
In online communities, where billions of people strive to propagate their messages, understanding how wording affects success is of primary importance. In this work, we are interested in one particularly salient aspect of wording: brevity. What is the causal effect of brevity on message success? What are the linguistic traits of brevity? When is brevity beneficial, and when is it not? Whereas most prior work has studied the effect of wording on style and success in observational setups, we conduct a controlled experiment, in which crowd workers shorten social media posts to prescribed target lengths and other crowd workers subsequently rate the original and shortened versions. This allows us to isolate the causal effect of brevity on the success of a message. We find that concise messages are on average more successful than the original messages up to a length reduction of 30-40%. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
