High-order partitioned spectral deferred correction solvers for multiphysics problems
Daniel Z. Huang, Will Pazner, Per-Olof Persson, Matthew J. Zahr

TL;DR
This paper introduces a high-order, partitioned spectral deferred correction method for multiphysics problems, enabling the use of existing solvers with improved stability and accuracy for coupled systems.
Contribution
It develops a generic high-order partitioned SDC framework, extending previous IMEX-based methods, with detailed stability analysis and practical demonstrations on various multiphysics problems.
Findings
High-order partitioned SDC schemes are conditionally stable and can be unconditionally stable under certain coupling conditions.
The proposed SDC methods outperform IMEX solvers in robustness for tested multiphysics problems.
Numerical experiments verify the order, stability, and efficiency of the new partitioned SDC solvers.
Abstract
We present an arbitrarily high-order, conditionally stable, partitioned spectral deferred correction (SDC) method for solving multiphysics problems using a sequence of pre-existing single-physics solvers. This method extends the work in [1, 2], which used implicit-explicit Runge-Kutta methods (IMEX) to build high-order, partitioned multiphysics solvers. We consider a generic multiphysics problem modeled as a system of coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs), coupled through coupling terms that can depend on the state of each subsystem; therefore the method applies to both a semi-discretized system of partial differential equations (PDEs) or problems naturally modeled as coupled systems of ODEs. The sufficient conditions to build arbitrarily high-order partitioned SDC schemes are derived. Based on these conditions, various of partitioned SDC schemes are designed. The stability of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
