Progenitors and Explosion Properties of Supernova Remnants Hosting Central Compact Objects: I. RCW 103 Associated with the Peculiar Source 1E 161348-5055

TL;DR

This study uses X-ray observations to analyze the supernova remnant RCW 103, revealing details about its ejecta, age, explosion energy, and progenitor mass, challenging previous estimates and providing new insights into its explosion properties.

Contribution

First detailed X-ray spectral analysis of RCW 103 linking ejecta composition to progenitor mass and explosion energy, refining previous estimates and exploring model degeneracies.

Findings

Estimated SNR age of 4.4 kyr

Progenitor mass around 12-13 solar masses

Explosion energy estimated at 3.7E49 erg

Abstract

We present a Chandra and XMM-Newton imaging and spectroscopic study of the supernova remnant (SNR) RCW 103 (G332.4-00.4) containing the Central Compact Object 1E 161348-5055. The high resolution Chandra X-ray images reveal enhanced emission in the south-eastern and north-western regions. Equivalent width line images of Fe L, Mg, Si, and S using XMM-Newton data were used to map the distribution of ejecta. The SNR was sectioned into 56 regions best characterized by two-component thermal models. The harder component (kT~0.6 keV) is adequately fitted by the VPSHOCK non-equilibrium ionization model with an ionization timescale ~ 1E11-1E12 cm^-3 s, and slightly enhanced abundances over solar values. The soft component (kT~0.2 keV), fitted by the APEC model, is well described by plasma in collisional ionization equilibrium with abundances consistent with solar values. Assuming a distance of 3.1 kpc and a Sedov phase of expansion into a uniform medium, we estimate an SNR age of 4.4 kyr, a swept-up mass M_sw=16 f_s^{-1/2} D_{3.1}^{5/2} solar masses, and a low explosion energy E=3.7E49 f_s^{-1/2} D_{3.1}^{5/2} erg. This energy could be an order of magnitude higher if we relax the Sedov assumption, the plasma has a low filling factor, the plasma temperature is under-estimated, or if the SNR is expanding into the progenitor's wind-blown bubble. Standard explosion models did not match the ejecta yields. By comparing the fitted abundances to the most recent core-collapse nucleosynthesis models, our best estimate yields a low-mass progenitor around 12-13 solar masses, lower than previously reported. We discuss degeneracies in the model fitting, particularly the effect of altering the explosion energy on the progenitor mass estimate.