Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: The relationship between mass and light around cosmic voids
Y. Fang, N. Hamaus, B. Jain, S. Pandey, G. Pollina, C. S\'anchez, A., Kov\'acs, C. Chang, J. Carretero, F. J. Castander, A. Choi, M. Crocce, J., DeRose, P. Fosalba, M. Gatti, E. Gazta\~naga, D. Gruen, W. G. Hartley, B., Hoyle, N. MacCrann, J. Prat, M. M. Rau, E. S. Rykoff

TL;DR
This study analyzes the mass and galaxy light profiles of cosmic voids in DES Year 1 data, using lensing and galaxy distribution methods to test the mass-light relationship with high precision.
Contribution
It introduces a combined lensing and galaxy profile analysis of cosmic voids, providing the most stringent test of the mass-light relationship to date.
Findings
Mass and light profiles are similar in shape, indicating a linear mass-light relation.
The methodology achieves high signal-to-noise ratios (10.7-14.0) in lensing measurements.
The analysis is validated with mock catalogues and accounts for redshift uncertainties.
Abstract
What are the mass and galaxy profiles of cosmic voids? In this paper we use two methods to extract voids in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 redMaGiC galaxy sample to address this question. We use either 2D slices in projection, or the 3D distribution of galaxies based on photometric redshifts to identify voids. For the mass profile, we measure the tangential shear profiles of background galaxies to infer the excess surface mass density. The signal-to-noise ratio for our lensing measurement ranges between 10.7 and 14.0 for the two void samples. We infer their 3D density profiles by fitting models based on N-body simulations and find good agreement for void radii in the range 15-85 Mpc. Comparison with their galaxy profiles then allows us to test the relation between mass and light at the 10%-level, the most stringent test to date. We find very similar shapes for the two profiles,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
