GJ357: A low-mass planetary system uncovered by precision radial-velocities and dynamical simulations
James S. Jenkins, Francisco J. Pozuelos, Mikko Tuomi, Zaira M., Berdi\~nas, Matias R. D\'iaz, Jose I. Vines, Juan C. Su\'arez, Pablo A., Pe\~na Rojas

TL;DR
This paper reports the discovery and analysis of a three-planet system around GJ357, using radial velocity data and dynamical simulations, confirming at least two super-Earths and characterizing their properties.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed characterization of the GJ357 planetary system, including mass, orbital dynamics, and composition, based on combined radial velocity and transit data.
Findings
Three planets confirmed with periods of 9.125, 3.9306, and 55.70 days.
GJ357c is a transiting super-Earth with known radius and density.
The system is likely coplanar and stable over millions of years.
Abstract
We report the detection of a new planetary system orbiting the nearby M2.5V star GJ357, using precision radial-velocities from three separate echelle spectrographs, HARPS, HiRES, and UVES. Three small planets have been confirmed in the system, with periods of 9.125+/-0.001, 3.9306+/-0.0003, and 55.70+/-0.05 days, and minimum masses of 3.33+/-0.48, 2.09+/-0.32, and 6.72+/-0.94 Me, respectively. The second planet in our system, GJ357c, was recently shown to transit by the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS; Luque et al. 2019), but we could find no transit signatures for the other two planets. Dynamical analysis reveals the system is likely to be close to coplanar, is stable on Myrs timescales, and places strong upper limits on the masses of the two non-transiting planets b and d of 4.25 and 11.20 Me, respectively. Therefore, we confirm the system contains at least two…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
