White-Box Evaluation of Fingerprint Matchers: Robustness to Minutiae Perturbations
Steven A. Grosz, Joshua J. Engelsma, Nicholas G. Paulter Jr., Anil, K. Jain

TL;DR
This paper conducts a detailed white-box evaluation of fingerprint matchers, revealing their vulnerabilities to non-linear distortions and missing minutiae, which are critical for improving system robustness.
Contribution
It provides the first controlled white-box assessment of minutiae-based fingerprint matchers' robustness to various perturbations.
Findings
Match performance degrades more with non-linear distortions.
Missing minutiae significantly impact matching accuracy.
Spurious minutiae and small displacements have less effect.
Abstract
Prevailing evaluations of fingerprint recognition systems have been performed as end-to-end black-box tests of fingerprint identification or authentication accuracy. However, performance of the end-to-end system is subject to errors arising in any of its constituent modules, including: fingerprint scanning, preprocessing, feature extraction, and matching. Conversely, white-box evaluations provide a more granular evaluation by studying the individual sub-components of a system. While a few studies have conducted stand-alone evaluations of the fingerprint reader and feature extraction modules of fingerprint recognition systems, little work has been devoted towards white-box evaluations of the fingerprint matching module. We report results of a controlled, white-box evaluation of one open-source and two commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) minutiae-based matchers in terms of their robustness…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
