Bounds for sets with no polynomial progressions
Sarah Peluse

TL;DR
This paper establishes upper bounds on the size of subsets of integers avoiding polynomial progressions, demonstrating they are significantly smaller than the entire set, and introduces a general method linking polynomial progression counts to Gowers norms.
Contribution
It provides new bounds for sets lacking polynomial progressions and develops a general framework connecting progression counts with Gowers norms.
Findings
Sets with no polynomial progressions are very sparse, bounded by N divided by a polylogarithmic factor.
A general result controlling polynomial progression counts via Gowers norms is proved.
The bounds depend on the degrees of the polynomials involved.
Abstract
Let be polynomials with distinct degrees, each having zero constant term. We show that any subset of with no nontrivial progressions of the form has size . Along the way, we prove a general result controlling weighted counts of polynomial progressions by Gowers norms.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
