Functional advantages of an adaptive Theory of Mind for robotics: a review of current architectures
Francesca Bianco, Dimitri Ognibene

TL;DR
This review examines current robotic architectures with adaptive Theory of Mind (ToM), highlighting their implementation methods and functional advantages, and emphasizes the need for further development of ToM features for improved human-robot interaction.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review of existing architectures and analyzes how often and in what ways ToM features are integrated into robots.
Findings
ToM features are variably implemented across architectures.
ToM for false-belief understanding is common, but proactive ToM is less so.
Advances in adaptive ToM are needed for better human-robot interaction.
Abstract
Great advancements have been achieved in the field of robotics, however, main challenges remain, including building robots with an adaptive Theory of Mind (ToM). In the present paper, seven current robotic architectures for human-robot interactions were described as well as four main functional advantages of equipping robots with an adaptive ToM. The aim of the present paper was to determine in which way and how often ToM features are integrated in the architectures analyzed, and if they provide robots with the associated functional advantages. Our assessment shows that different methods are used to implement ToM features in robotic architectures. Furthermore, while a ToM for false-belief understanding and tracking is often built in social robotic architectures, a ToM for proactivity, active perception and learning is less common. Nonetheless, progresses towards better adaptive ToM…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
