Physical modelling of galaxy clusters and Bayesian inference in astrophysics
Kamran Javid

TL;DR
This paper compares galaxy cluster mass estimates from AMI radio data and Planck satellite data using Bayesian models, introduces a new nested sampling algorithm, and explores improvements in physical cluster modeling.
Contribution
It presents a comprehensive Bayesian analysis framework for galaxy clusters, compares different models and data sources, and introduces a novel geometric nested sampling algorithm.
Findings
Bayesian models effectively estimate cluster masses from AMI and Planck data.
The new geometric nested sampler improves sampling efficiency.
Physical model modifications enhance cluster parameter inference.
Abstract
I compare the mass values obtained with data taken from the Arcminute Microkelvin Imager (AMI) radio interferometer system and from the Planck satellite. The former of these uses a Bayesian analysis pipeline that parameterises a cluster in terms of its physical quantities, and models the dark matter \& baryonic components of a cluster using Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) and generalised-NFW profiles respectively. I also analyse simulated AMI data with input values based on PwS mass estimates. I then compare three cluster models using AMI data for the 54 cluster sample. The two observational models considered only model the gas content of the cluster. To compare the physical and observational models I consider their posterior parameter estimates, including the calculation of a metric defined between two probability distributions. The models' fit to the cluster data is evaluated by looking at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
