A counterexample to a Proposition of Feldvoss-Wagemann and Burde-Wagemann
Teimuraz Pirashvili

TL;DR
This paper identifies a flaw in a recent proof claiming that a finite-dimensional complex Lie algebra is semi-simple if and only if its Leibniz homology vanishes in positive dimensions, challenging a proposed characterization.
Contribution
It provides a counterexample to a conjecture linking semi-simplicity of Lie algebras with Leibniz homology vanishing, and points out an error in the proof by Burde and Wagemann.
Findings
The conjecture is false due to a counterexample.
The proof by Burde and Wagemann contains a mistake.
Leibniz homology does not characterize semi-simplicity as previously claimed.
Abstract
Our (weak) conjecture claims that a finite dimensional Lie algebra over the field of complex numbers is semi-simple iff the Leibniz homology vanishes in positive dimensions , . We will indicate a mistake in the recent proof of this conjecture due to Burde and Wagemann.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topics in Algebra · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
