TL;DR
This study analyzes how mentorship and collaboration influence success and community formation among electronic music artists, revealing that mentorship aids rising talents but does not guarantee top-tier success, with elite status being highly stable over time.
Contribution
It uncovers the role of mentorship in shaping artist success and community structures within electronic music, highlighting the limited benefits for mentees to reach top ranks.
Findings
Top 20 artists are stable over time, showing a lock-in effect.
Mentorship significantly influences community formation and artist success.
Mentees are less likely to reach top 20 but have higher average ranks than non-mentored artists.
Abstract
While the emergence of success in creative professions, such as music, has been studied extensively, the link between individual success and collaboration is not yet fully uncovered. Here we aim to fill this gap by analyzing longitudinal data on the co-releasing and mentoring patterns of popular electronic music artists appearing in the annual Top 100 ranking of DJ Magazine. We find that while this ranking list of popularity publishes 100 names, only the top 20 is stable over time, showcasing a lock-in effect on the electronic music elite. Based on the temporal co-release network of top musicians, we extract a diverse community structure characterizing the electronic music industry. These groups of artists are temporally segregated, sequentially formed around leading musicians, and represent changes in musical genres. We show that a major driving force behind the formation of music…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
