Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes as a Potential Veto Array for Neutrino Astronomy
D. Rysewyk, D. Lennarz, T. DeYoung, J. Auffenberg, M. Schaufel, T., Bretz, C. Wiebusch, and M. U. Nisa

TL;DR
This paper explores using an array of small, wide-field Imaging Air Cherenkov Telescopes as a cost-effective veto system to distinguish atmospheric background events from astrophysical neutrinos in neutrino observatories like IceCube.
Contribution
It proposes a feasible design for a small-scale IACT array to enhance neutrino detection sensitivity by reducing atmospheric background interference.
Findings
A surface array of 250-750 IACTs can significantly improve neutrino telescope performance.
The proposed IACT array is cost-effective, costing only a few percent of large-scale neutrino detectors.
Optimization of the number of telescopes depends on astronomical and geometrical factors.
Abstract
The IceCube Neutrino Observatory has revealed the existence of sources of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos. However, identification of the sources is challenging because astrophysical neutrinos are difficult to separate from the background of atmospheric neutrinos produced in cosmic-ray-induced particle cascades in the atmosphere. The efficient detection of air showers in coincidence with detected neutrinos can greatly reduce those backgrounds and increase the sensitivity of neutrino telescopes. Imaging Air Cherenkov Telescopes (IACTs) are sensitive to gamma-ray-induced (and cosmic-ray-induced) air showers in the 50 GeV to 50 TeV range, and can therefore be used as background-identifiers for neutrino observatories. This paper describes the feasibility of an array of small scale, wide field-of-view, cost-effective IACTs as an air shower veto for neutrino astronomy. A surface array of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
