The Rise and Fall of the Note: Changing Paper Lengths in ACM CSCW, 2000-2018
R. Stuart Geiger

TL;DR
This study analyzes the trends in paper lengths in ACM CSCW from 2000 to 2018, highlighting the rise and fall of the 4-page note and the increasing length of papers over time, with implications for scholarly communication.
Contribution
It provides a quantitative analysis of publication genre shifts in CSCW, linking editorial policy changes to evolving paper lengths and scholarly practices.
Findings
4-page notes declined after 2013
Paper lengths have steadily increased over time
The disappearance of notes correlates with policy changes
Abstract
In this note, I quantitatively examine various trends in the lengths of published papers in ACM CSCW from 2000-2018, focusing on several major transitions in editorial and reviewing policy. The focus is on the rise and fall of the 4-page note, which was introduced in 2004 as a separate submission type to the 10-page double-column "full paper" format. From 2004-2012, 4-page notes of 2,500 to 4,500 words consistently represented about 20-35\% of all publications. In 2013, minimum and maximum page lengths were officially removed, with no formal distinction made between full papers and notes. The note soon completely disappeared as a distinct genre, which co-occurred with a trend in steadily rising paper lengths. I discuss such findings both as they directly relate to local concerns in CSCW and in the context of longstanding theoretical discussions around genre theory and how…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInformation Systems Theories and Implementation · Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development · History of Computing Technologies
