Classical versus Quantum Models in Machine Learning: Insights from a Finance Application
Javier Alcazar, Vicente Leyton-Ortega, Alejandro Perdomo-Ortiz

TL;DR
This paper compares classical restricted Boltzmann machines and quantum circuit Born machines on real-world financial data, demonstrating quantum models' potential superior performance with near-term quantum hardware.
Contribution
It provides the first direct comparison of classical and quantum generative models on real-world datasets, highlighting quantum models' advantages in practical scenarios.
Findings
Quantum models outperform classical RBMs on financial datasets with equal resources.
QCBMs are implementable on near-term ion-trap quantum hardware.
Quantum models show promise for real-world applications in finance.
Abstract
Although several models have been proposed towards assisting machine learning (ML) tasks with quantum computers, a direct comparison of the expressive power and efficiency of classical versus quantum models for datasets originating from real-world applications is one of the key milestones towards a quantum ready era. Here, we take a first step towards addressing this challenge by performing a comparison of the widely used classical ML models known as restricted Boltzmann machines (RBMs), against a recently proposed quantum model, now known as quantum circuit Born machines (QCBMs). Both models address the same hard tasks in unsupervised generative modeling, with QCBMs exploiting the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics and a candidate for near-term quantum computers, as experimentally demonstrated in three different quantum hardware architectures to date. To address the question of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
