Explaining the low luminosity of Uranus: A self-consistent thermal and structural evolution
A. Vazan, R. Helled

TL;DR
This study investigates Uranus's low luminosity by modeling its internal structure with composition gradients, showing that non-adiabatic processes and stable mixing can explain its thermal properties and primordial state.
Contribution
It introduces self-consistent models with composition gradients that explain Uranus's low luminosity and stability, challenging the idea of a fully differentiated interior.
Findings
Composition gradients can stabilize Uranus's interior against convection.
Uranus's interior may still be very hot despite low luminosity.
The initial energy of Uranus is likely less than 20% of its formation energy.
Abstract
The low luminosity of Uranus is a long-standing challenge in planetary science. Simple adiabatic models are inconsistent with the measured luminosity, which indicates that Uranus is non-adiabatic because it has thermal boundary layers and/or conductive regions. A gradual composition distribution acts as a thermal boundary to suppress convection and slow down the internal cooling. Here we investigate whether composition gradients in the deep interior of Uranus can explain its low luminosity, the required composition gradient, and whether it is stable for convective mixing on a timescale of some billion years. We varied the primordial composition distribution and the initial energy budget of the planet, and chose the models that fit the currently measured properties (radius, luminosity, and moment of inertia) of Uranus. We present several alternative non-adiabatic internal structures that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
